What does the 8th of March tell us about gender and political communication?


Giuseppe Carteny

11.03.2025


A few days ago, on 8 March, we celebrated International Women’s Day, dedicated to women's fight for equality and liberation. Social media were flooded with messages by netizens celebrating the day. As usual, institutions, parties, and politicians did not miss the opportunity to post their celebratory messages on social media. But as we scrolled through, one question came to mind: but what happens the rest of the year? Do politicians and parties pay lip service to gender equality only on that day? Or do they actually engage with it more consistently, at least in their online communication?

 

There are, of course, several ways to approach some of these questions. You could look anecdotally to see if this or that politician has posted anything about gender equality and compare it with other posts from the same account. Others might focus on a few key social media accounts and look qualitatively at the content of their posts. In our case, we decided to address these questions by looking at the stability of parties' and politicians' online engagement with gender-related issues over time. 

Figure 1 - How relevant are gender-related issues in political communication in Germany and Spain

Thus, we engaged with a (quick and dirty) quantitative exploratory analysis of Twitter (then X) data that we collected for a previous project in which we addressed how politician’s engagement has changed during Musk’s acquisition of Twitter/X. More specifically, we selected two random samples of tweets from German and Spanish politicians and parties’ accounts, between 2020 and June 2023. We then applied a large language model (LLM), fine-tuned on party manifestos from the UNTWIST project, to detect whether or not a tweet is gender-related or not. Finally, we estimated the percentage of tweets, in a given week, containing at least one sentence dedicated to gender-related topics, as predicted by our LLM. We use then this quantity as an indicator of political actors’ attention to issues related to gender equality, at least in their online political communication.

 

What we find is that, firstly, the average amount of attention given to gender issues during the week of 8 March is higher than the rest of the year. The purple dots in the figure above (Figure 1) indicate the proportion of tweets dedicated to gender-related topics in the weeks around 8 March, and they tend to be higher than the grey dots - which indicate attention to gender in the rest of the week. We can then see that attention to these topics is actually quite stable over time. Despite some fluctuations, the smoothed average, the blue lines in the graph, are fairly flat - with a slight increase in Spain. There are also clear differences in attention when comparing the German and Spanish contexts. In Spain, on average, more than 10% of the content of tweets is gender-related. In Germany, on the other hand, the average is around 7% of the content. Nevertheless, in the German case there isn't as much variation over time as in the Spanish case, suggesting that German political actors' attention to gender issues seems to be more consistent over time than in the Spanish case.

 

These findings are not particularly surprising. In part, they are similar to what we found when analysing party manifestos. There are obvious differences between countries, probably reflecting differences in political culture, institutions and, more generally, the historical trajectories that have shaped both. But parties do give different importance to different issues in different media. And what we see is that gender issues are indeed more prominent in online communication than in parties' manifestos.

 

Although our analyses produced interesting results, we were not entirely satisfied. Aggregate results, such as those presented above, may mask relevant patterns that might emerge when looking at more disaggregated data. So we decided to go one step further and look at how attention varies between parties or politicians.  This is because, in theory, attention should vary. Gender equality is an issue that, by definition, is linked to one of the most important and fundamental issues in democratic societies: equality. An issue that, in turn, is at the heart of a fundamental - if not the most fundamental - line of political conflict in Western liberal democracies: the left-right dimension.

 

We would therefore expect that parties that support equality on a range of socio-political issues - communist, post-communist, socialist, social-democratic, but also green, liberal, radical-liberal and liberal-democratic parties - would pay more attention to these issues than more conservative or traditionalist forces. We know that parties tend to emphasise issues that they 'own' for a variety of reasons, and we can safely assume that these parties 'own' equality issues because they're part of their core message. Nevertheless, we might also expect that parties that oppose equality on a range of issues might find themselves in a battle with more progressive forces. Radical right-wing populist actors have explicitly challenged gender equality on a number of issues in recent years as part of their campaign against what they define as 'woke culture'. We should therefore expect to see some attention to these issues from these forces.  And what our analyses show is that these expectations are at least partly correct.

 

In Germany, political actors tend to show rather similar levels of attention to gender issues. Politicians from the Greens and Die Linke are arguably those who pay more attention to the issue. But their attention is not far from that of members of the SPD and CDU/CSU or even the AfD. On the contrary, the party that seems to pay less attention to these issues is the FDP, the German liberals. It is also interesting to note that the Liberals and the AfD are the only two parties that tend not to pay more attention to these issues in the 8 March weeks. 


Figure 2- German and Spanish politicians and party attention to gender-related issues


In Spain, the results are a little closer to our expectations. Politicians from social-liberal forces (especially Podemos, Esquerra, PSOE and Ciudadanos) are much more attentive to these issues than those from the country's main conservative party (Partido Popular, PP). Moreover, in this case too, we find that members of the country's far-right populist force, VOX, tend to pay the same attention to these issues as progressive forces.

 

To sum it up, our study shows a clear trend in political communication: gender issues get a noticeable boost around International Women’s Day, and for the rest of the year attention is definitely lower. But what we find is also a steady level of discussion all year long, despite some reasonable variability. So, while politicians and parties use this key date to push messages about equality, gender topics remain a regular part of their online communication.

 

We also found some interesting differences, between and withing contexts. In Spain, for example, politicians tend to talk more about gender issues and with more ups and downs compared to their more consistent German counterparts. And even though progressive parties make gender equality a core part of their message, it’s not completely ignored by conservative or even far-right groups which seem, actually, to have increased their engagement over time.

 

Our results should be taken with a pinch of salt. Mainly because the model output was not properly validated, and predictions for the same model showed a tendency include in the gender-related category sentences that might not be considered as such - at least according to the definition used in the UNTWIST project. Nevertheless, the model performed very well in the fine-tuning phase, and we already know the direction of the potential bias - upwards. This means that attention to gender issues in political communication may be even lower than we have estimated.